![]() |
Amsterdam. Source |
There are 1 million
bicycles in Amsterdam, and 820,000 people.
It is true, we do like our bicycles. On average we each bike around 1000km a year. There are 10 synonyms in the Dutch language that mean ‘bike’. We’ve all taken and passed our bike exam.
And yet, this fact has always seemed odd to me. Why are there more bikes than
people? You only really need one.
Indeed, all this is a metaphor: a metaphor for the excess, for overconsumption,
the unsustainable flow of energy and material things. Currently humanity
uses 1.6 Earths to satisfy our demands and absorb our wastes. This is
problematic, seeing that we only have one.
So why have I chosen to use such a human invention to name an environmental
blog? Why is it valuable to study overconsumption, such a social phenomenon,
when we're considering the natural? While this will become apparent over the
course of the blog, perhaps it’s valuable to introduce the answer by turning
to Steffen et al.'s work on The Great Acceleration.
The Great Acceleration, simply put, refers to a period of time (post-1950s) in
which several key trends of both the socioeconomic and biophysical spheres
‘greatly accelerated’. These key indicators are summarized as per the 24
diagrams below.
![]() |
Source: Steffen et al., 2015 |
On the left, what is
immediately evident is the overall increase in economic activity. Real GDP has
strongly increased in the 60 years displayed. This is both enabled by and
enabling the growth of other indicators. On the right the Earth System trends
exhibit similar acceleration; the three major GHGs – carbon dioxide, nitrous
oxide and methane - have all increased in atmospheric concentration. The link
between primary energy use, atmospheric concentration of CO2 and surface
temperature increase is now overwhelmingly clear – except for Scott Pruitt, of course.
Now, you may argue; yes these parameters are increasing, but what does human
activity have to do with the changing structure of the Earth system? As it
turns out - a lot, have a look at some of the evidence.
Or, you may assert; are these changes necessarily so different than past
states? I'd suggest reading up on the planetary boundary perspective, which
maintains that there are critical boundaries that should not be crossed if we
wish to sustain a safe operating space for humanity.
I look forward to
discovering where this journey will take me!
Comments
Post a Comment